>~Star Child~ Lapis Lazuli No edit summary |
>LainIwakura mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Lips McGee|Lips McGee]] ([[User talk:Lips McGee|talk]]) 04:46, July 6, 2017 (UTC) | [[User:Lips McGee|Lips McGee]] ([[User talk:Lips McGee|talk]]) 04:46, July 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
If you want, sure. I really doubt anyone would be like "no you can't write a detailed description of this removed world" [[User:LainIwakura|LainIwakura]] ([[User talk:LainIwakura|talk]]) 09:49, July 7, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:49, 7 July 2017
Should we expand upon this page? Although the world is inaccessible, the page itself is literally the smallest world page on the wiki, and all seven other worlds filed under the Removed Content tag, including all those old 710 worlds that were in like the 0.07s as far as versions were concerned, have actual descriptions behind them, so I'm going to argue it deserves at least a little bit of elaboration of what was actually found here, but what do you guys think?
(I will admit that it's partially because I'm kind of biased for this world that I'm asking. Like seriously, this place is beautiful. That, and it's our only stub article, so given how slow current 2kki development is, pages to expand upon are in rare commodity these days)
EDIT: Okay Arc de Pillar World is also a stub but that world is just really really small and I'd argue it doesn't need the stub.
Lips McGee (talk) 04:46, July 6, 2017 (UTC)
If you want, sure. I really doubt anyone would be like "no you can't write a detailed description of this removed world" LainIwakura (talk) 09:49, July 7, 2017 (UTC)