>Cookie Yomenye No edit summary |
>Derbysm No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Thinking back to that discussion on the forum we had a few months ago, I think we've established that articles should be factual first and foremost. That said, I still try to exercise caution whenever editing other people's work, so as to strike a balance between strife for quality and personal contribution. So, there's my reasoning. <br/>// [[User:Cookie Yomenye|Cookie Yomenye]] ([[User talk:Cookie Yomenye|talk]]) 20:28, July 3, 2018 (UTC) | Thinking back to that discussion on the forum we had a few months ago, I think we've established that articles should be factual first and foremost. That said, I still try to exercise caution whenever editing other people's work, so as to strike a balance between strife for quality and personal contribution. So, there's my reasoning. <br/>// [[User:Cookie Yomenye|Cookie Yomenye]] ([[User talk:Cookie Yomenye|talk]]) 20:28, July 3, 2018 (UTC) | ||
As for the new content added in 0.108g, there's a lot of stuff in the basement of the area now. Given the fact that the article is already quite massive in terms of text, should a new page be created for the basement/chess room stuff? If yes, I'd likely use the name "Monkey Basement" or such. if you have any other ideas, do share. [[User:Derbysm|Derbysm]] ([[User talk:Derbysm|talk]]) 23:08, March 28, 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 28 March 2019
Not to offend anyone, but I think the theory tidbit about "Urotsuki viewing herself as less than human" doesn't belong in the article. Two reasons: one, it's entirely speculative; and two, there is no evidence that the layout similarity is not just a coincidence. As such pointing it out is one thing, but theorizing over it as an established fact is another. I suggest editing it out for the time being. Cookie Yomenye (talk) 19:41, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
To me it seems far too uncanny of a similarity to be a coincidence, but I suppose it doesn't make much of a difference anyways.
In all honesty, I've always considered making more of a place for theories in this wiki, but I've never been sure how. I mostly just put that in there because other wikis do the same thing. If you think we should edit it out and just leave it as something like "the significance of this is unknown as of (date) or something of the sort, I'd be fine with that honestly, you never offended me. Lips McGee (talk) 19:46, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
Wasn't there a dedicated page for theories specifically? If not, there's always forum. To be honest, I myself don't really care for theories; most of them are much too obvious, and they seem to limit the openness to interpretation – a significant part of any dream diary experience in my book.
Thinking back to that discussion on the forum we had a few months ago, I think we've established that articles should be factual first and foremost. That said, I still try to exercise caution whenever editing other people's work, so as to strike a balance between strife for quality and personal contribution. So, there's my reasoning.
// Cookie Yomenye (talk) 20:28, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
As for the new content added in 0.108g, there's a lot of stuff in the basement of the area now. Given the fact that the article is already quite massive in terms of text, should a new page be created for the basement/chess room stuff? If yes, I'd likely use the name "Monkey Basement" or such. if you have any other ideas, do share. Derbysm (talk) 23:08, March 28, 2019 (UTC)