No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Page lock== | ==Page lock== | ||
Hey, I saw the page was [[Special:Log/protect/Nexrob010|indefinitely protected]] for the reason of "edit warring". I really disagree with an indefinite page protection. The edit was copying the old caption that was then reverted [[Collective Unconscious:Scrimblo World/ass|by the author's request]], which seems to me like [[User:Saphhire]] was trying to be funny. This was only one edit after 3 months, so I don't think it should be called an "edit war" so quickly. I believe at most Sapphire should receive a warning to not edit pages for jokes, and that the protection should be removed. [[User:ZASNK|--ZASNK]] ([[User talk:ZASNK|talk]]) 14:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | Hey, I saw the page was [[Special:Log/protect/Nexrob010|indefinitely protected]] for the reason of "edit warring". I really disagree with an indefinite page protection. The edit was copying the old caption that was then reverted [[Collective Unconscious:Scrimblo World/ass|by the author's request]], which seems to me like [[User:Saphhire]] was trying to be funny. This was only one edit after 3 months, so I don't think it should be called an "edit war" so quickly. I believe at most Sapphire should receive a warning to not edit pages for jokes, and that the protection should be removed. [[User:ZASNK|--ZASNK]] ([[User talk:ZASNK|talk]]) 14:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Hi, I'm the one that locked the page. I can remove it now, and I agree that [[User:Saphhire]] should instead receive a warning for this. My initial reasoning for this decision was my wrongful assumption that this had been happening, albeit slowly, over the course of months. Or, I thought so from how [[User:WikiOdd]] worded his request over on the YumeWiki discord. But honestly, if I'm allowed to say it, this whole keeping the caption the same thing is a bit ridiculous. It's a caption. It's plain text. Such a tiny issue in the grand scheme of things. Maybe it shouldn't even have a caption due to how vulnerable it is to vandalism. But then if we don't give it a caption it'll be at more risk. Hm. --[[User:Nexrob010|Nexrob010]] ([[User talk:Nexrob010|talk]]) 20:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:53, 11 December 2024
Page lock
Hey, I saw the page was indefinitely protected for the reason of "edit warring". I really disagree with an indefinite page protection. The edit was copying the old caption that was then reverted by the author's request, which seems to me like User:Saphhire was trying to be funny. This was only one edit after 3 months, so I don't think it should be called an "edit war" so quickly. I believe at most Sapphire should receive a warning to not edit pages for jokes, and that the protection should be removed. --ZASNK (talk) 14:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm the one that locked the page. I can remove it now, and I agree that User:Saphhire should instead receive a warning for this. My initial reasoning for this decision was my wrongful assumption that this had been happening, albeit slowly, over the course of months. Or, I thought so from how User:WikiOdd worded his request over on the YumeWiki discord. But honestly, if I'm allowed to say it, this whole keeping the caption the same thing is a bit ridiculous. It's a caption. It's plain text. Such a tiny issue in the grand scheme of things. Maybe it shouldn't even have a caption due to how vulnerable it is to vandalism. But then if we don't give it a caption it'll be at more risk. Hm. --Nexrob010 (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)