>Cookie Yomenye (Created page with "Not to offend anyone, but I think the theory tidbit about "Urotsuki viewing herself as less than human" doesn't belong in the article. Two reasons: one, it's entirely speculat...") |
>~Star Child~ Lapis Lazuli No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not to offend anyone, but I think the theory tidbit about "Urotsuki viewing herself as less than human" doesn't belong in the article. Two reasons: one, it's entirely speculative; and two, there is no evidence that the layout similarity is not just a coincidence. As such pointing it out is one thing, but theorizing over it as an established fact is another. I suggest editing it out for the time being. [[User:Cookie Yomenye|Cookie Yomenye]] ([[User talk:Cookie Yomenye|talk]]) 19:41, July 3, 2018 (UTC) | Not to offend anyone, but I think the theory tidbit about "Urotsuki viewing herself as less than human" doesn't belong in the article. Two reasons: one, it's entirely speculative; and two, there is no evidence that the layout similarity is not just a coincidence. As such pointing it out is one thing, but theorizing over it as an established fact is another. I suggest editing it out for the time being. [[User:Cookie Yomenye|Cookie Yomenye]] ([[User talk:Cookie Yomenye|talk]]) 19:41, July 3, 2018 (UTC) | ||
To me it seems ''far'' too uncanny of a similarity to be a coincidence, but I suppose it doesn't make much of a difference anyways. | |||
In all honesty, I've always considered making more of a place for theories in this wiki, but I've never been sure how. I mostly just put that in there because other wikis do the same thing. If you think we should edit it out and just leave it as something like "the significance of this is unknown as of (date) or something of the sort, I'd be fine with that honestly, you never offended me. [[User:Lips McGee|Lips McGee]] ([[User talk:Lips McGee|talk]]) 19:46, July 3, 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:46, 3 July 2018
Not to offend anyone, but I think the theory tidbit about "Urotsuki viewing herself as less than human" doesn't belong in the article. Two reasons: one, it's entirely speculative; and two, there is no evidence that the layout similarity is not just a coincidence. As such pointing it out is one thing, but theorizing over it as an established fact is another. I suggest editing it out for the time being. Cookie Yomenye (talk) 19:41, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
To me it seems far too uncanny of a similarity to be a coincidence, but I suppose it doesn't make much of a difference anyways.
In all honesty, I've always considered making more of a place for theories in this wiki, but I've never been sure how. I mostly just put that in there because other wikis do the same thing. If you think we should edit it out and just leave it as something like "the significance of this is unknown as of (date) or something of the sort, I'd be fine with that honestly, you never offended me. Lips McGee (talk) 19:46, July 3, 2018 (UTC)